READING RESPONSES
regarding the "type image message" reading:
which of these composition strategies have you used the most in the past?
how do you see these strategies applying to your current type work at kcai (are you already using them in some way), or how might you re-imagine your current experiments to try these out?
Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reading. Show all posts
2.22.2010
2.01.2010
week 2 :: reading
TRIGGS RESPONSES PP 12-17
what do you think about technology's role in enabling typographic experimentation? what technology is the present-day equivalent to the desktop computer, and how might that be utilized in type design or typography?
what potential exists for continuing to explore the "second order of denotation" as mentioned in the cranbrook/mccoy sections?
further, what potential might your area of interest have to "promote multiple rather than fixed meanings" as jeffery keedy mentions? and what role might the reader play in the construction of your typographic messages?
thoughts? does this spur any ideas for your own work? respond in the comments here.
what do you think about technology's role in enabling typographic experimentation? what technology is the present-day equivalent to the desktop computer, and how might that be utilized in type design or typography?
what potential exists for continuing to explore the "second order of denotation" as mentioned in the cranbrook/mccoy sections?
further, what potential might your area of interest have to "promote multiple rather than fixed meanings" as jeffery keedy mentions? and what role might the reader play in the construction of your typographic messages?
thoughts? does this spur any ideas for your own work? respond in the comments here.
1.26.2010
week 1 :: reading
BIL'AK + TRIGGS RESPONSES
what did you think of these readings? does their definition of "experimental" match what you previously thought of the term? is it really useful to experiment if it doesn't have real application?
what did you think of these readings? does their definition of "experimental" match what you previously thought of the term? is it really useful to experiment if it doesn't have real application?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)